Two Sources

http://caliber.ucpress.net/doi/abs/10.1525/sop.2009.52.2.211 Scholarly Source

This source is a scholarly source because it has information that has been cited from credited factual information and does not put in opinions or general public appeal.

http://www.springerlink.com/content/p28244k278588020/ Non-scholarly Source

This source is a journal article. It has views that it is trying to give to the reader and is not a credited source

Like this:

Be the first to like this post.

This entry was posted on October 2, 2009 at 9:29 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

One Response to “Two Sources”

abcolton Says:
October 7, 2009 at 4:14 pm | Reply
Hi Tom,
I need you to give some information on these sources. Also I want you to look at these as credible versus questionable. A non-scholarly source is not necessarily questionable, though this might play into your evaluation of it. Then explain why you think one is questionable and one is not.

Alyssa